Stephen Guy Hardin's HARDIN REPUBLIC

 

The Latest...!

Page Two...

The Op-Ed Page

Vid Clips

The Audio Files

Publisher's Notes

Travels with Bonnie

The Blogasphere

Stephen Guy Hardin

Eugenia Bambas

Eugenia's Notes of Praise

Louie Theodores

Rep. Dr. Tom Price

Rep. John Boehner

Sam Olens

Daria DiGiovanni

Kimberly Morin

Byron Harvey

A Sailor's Journal

Elise Hardin

Mark Delk

Mark Obenshain

Gregg Rubin

Robyn Castellano Rubin

Leanne Livingston

The Fourth Republic

Mary Mostert

Ann Coulter

Mark Steyn

Michelle Malkin

KT McFarland

The President

The Obama Scandals

Obama Politics

Obamamaniacs

Barack's Comrades

Where's Joe...?

The First Lady

Election 2010

The Next President

When Stars Collide

Hollywood From the RIGHT

Media Madness

Modern Media

Humor In Politics

The Best of Dennis Miller

Penn & Teller on Politics

The Draking Point

Dirty Tricks Inc.

The Politics of Race

Immigration Politics

The Politics of Gossip

The Politics of Marx

The Politics of Being Gay

The Politics of the Court

The Politics of Money

The Politics of 'Green'

The Politics of Abortion

The Politics of Religion

The Politics of Jihad

The Politics of Guns

The NRA

Guns N' Girls

War On Our Borders

The TEA Party

The Libertarians

The Republican Party

Your Local GOP

Palin's Flying Circus

Gov. Bobby Jindal

Mike Huckabee

Where's Mitt ?

Jan Brewer

Tim Pawlenty

Michele Bachmann

Newt Gingrich

The Other Bush

Ron Paul

The Democrat Party

The Soros Files

The Bill and Hillary Show

The Empress Pelosi

Barney Frank Hates You !

Chris is Tingling...

Is Keith Oberman Insane ?

ACORN

Global Terrorism

Ronald Reagan LIVE

News Links

To Contact

Global Terrorism
Convert Or Die !
Updated May 05, 2010

Times Square Bomb Suspect May Have Received Online Education in Jihad

By Jana Winter

 - FOXNews.com

The 30-year-old Pakistani-American accused of trying to blow up an SUV in the heart of Times Square may have been poring through the Internet for years to gather information on jihad. FoxNews.com has uncovered several dozens of postings by a man named Faisal Shahzad on radical Islamist Salafist websites devoted to a variety of different jihadist sects. 

A man who was identified by neighbors in Connecticut as Faisal Shahzad, is shown. (AP/Orkut.com)

The 30-year-old Pakistani-American accused of trying to blow up an SUV in the heart of Times Square may have been poring through the Internet for years to gather information on jihad.

FoxNews.com has uncovered several dozens of postings by a man named Faisal Shahzad on radical Islamist Salafist websites devoted to a variety of different jihadist sects. 

Experts suspect this is the same Faisal Shahzad whom authorities have charged with plotting to explode a massive car bomb in New York on Saturday. If so, then he has been educating himself on the Internet for years on the legitimacy of holy war.

Shahzad visited numerous websites devoted to ideological discussion of Islamism and Shariah law. His apparent online posts date back to at least 2006 — three years before the Times Square suspect became a naturalized American citizen.

“If the person on these websites is indeed the suspected bomber, the postings show that he was intellectually thinking about engaging in jihadism for a few years,” said Dr. Walid Phares, director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “Knowing that, the ideology of jihadism often has inspired violence and terrorism....

“These can be coined as Islamist Salafist websites where lots of material is posted, including theological, ideological and political texts and blogs,” Phares said,  noting that he saw discussions about fatwas, jihad and other Islamist causes on these sites."

Islamist Salafists are extreme radical militants who are calling for the establishment of a Taliban-like regime in the Muslim world, and who seek to replace secular laws around the world with Muslim Shariah law.

"Individuals do not become jihadists overnight or because of one major crisis or event, as some social scientists proclaim," Phares said. "They become jihadists over time, after a gradual change, consciously in a stable intellectual process."

An FBI spokesman said any possible online postings by Shahzad would be investigated.

An intelligence source initially provided Fox News with a link to what was believed to be an online posting by the Times Square suspect. Using details from that post, FoxNews.com found several dozen more on radical Islamic jihadist sites devoted to a range of Salafist sects. These other postings shared either the same IP address — in Pakistan — or e-mail address or partial e-mail address. (For example, in some cases the same user name appeared on both Yahoo and Hotmail accounts.)

The initial post, dated May 24, 2006, and placed on the World Islamic Mission Forum by a user named Faisal Shahzad, inquires into the purchasing of a recorded sermon. 

He wrote:

Dear do u know the website where i can find the download able Munazaras of AHLESUNNAT WITH EVIL SECTS. Do u know any successfull Mubahila held ?

Wasalam

Faisal

In response to that post, Faisal was directed to another site, Yanabi.com (Oh Prophet!), where a member had posted a list of the many sermons he had available for purchase.

A user wrote:

I have various lectures by some excellent ulema of Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, such as,

Dr. Tahir Ul Qadri (I had the pleasure of attending his gathering at my local minhaj-ul-quran masjid).
Moulana Saeed Ahmed Asad (Would Love To Listen To Him Live)
Moulana Mukhtar Shah Sahab (Without a doubt my favorite)
Moulana Fateh Deen Chishti Sahab (rehmat Ullah Alai)
Moulana Kookab Noorani Sahab
Moulana Shafi Okarvi Sahab (father Of Moulana Kookab Noorani Sahab)
Moulana Sayyed Hashmi Mian Sahab Indiawaale
and many more.


These are in audio and video. I have also got manazra (debates) of Moulana Saeed Ahmed Asad Sahab, Moulana Abdul Kareem Naqshbandi Sahab, Moulana Muhammed Jameel Ahmed Sadiqqi Sahab, and more. All in Vid.

A member named Faisal Shahzad joined the discussion several posts later asking for help finding the downloads of the tapes he’d ordered.

In many of his posts, the man intelligence officials believe is the Times Square bomber appears to be an eager and inquisitive student, and he frequently engaged in discussions revolving around the ideological argument at the heart of different schools of jihadist thought.  

He asked, for example, why a certain fatwa was issued in one instance while one was not in a similar situation. He asked about the specific differences in the beliefs of Salafists around the world, and the reasoning behind them.

He questioned the ideology behind a fatwa issued by the Deobandi school of thought in India. (Deobandi is an extremist South Asian form of Islam; major Taliban leaders attended Deobandi madrassas.)

In other posts, also uncovered by FoxNews.com, a user who also appears to be Shahzad inquired about how to obtain work visas in Italy and Canada. That same person was a member of a Google group that recently circulated a petition opposing a cartoon rendering of Muhammad that appeared in the Australian media.


Full Post
Posted Friday, April 23, 2010 4:30 PM

Al Qaeda 'Leaders' Plotted NYC Subway Attacks

Newsweek

By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball

In a Brooklyn court hearing on Friday, federal investigators presented eyewitness evidence that, at least as of 2008, Al Qaeda "central" was still capable of organizing plots on U.S. territory. Zarein Ahmedzay, a confessed member of a terror cell that was plotting suicide-bomb attacks on the New York City subway system last September, told a federal judge that he and two of his colleagues were personally recruited for their mission by two top Qaeda operatives, one of whom was Saleh al-Somali, identified by the feds as "the chief of international operations" for the terror group.

In a statement made at a hearing to enter his guilty plea to U.S. terrorism charges, Ahmedzay said that after traveling from the United States to Pakistan’s tribal region of Waziristan in August 2008, he and two American colleagues met with al-Somali and another top Qaeda operative, Rashid Rauf, the latter formerly a resident of England. The two Qaeda leaders enticed the visitors from America to abandon a plan they had concocted to join Islamic insurgents fighting U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan. 
 
Instead the two Qaeda chiefs explained to the Americans that "they would be more useful to Al Qaeda and the jihad if they returned to New York and conducted attacks there." Attorney General Eric Holder said the facts disclosed today by Ahmedzay "add chilling details" to the New York subway plot, whose mastermind, Najibullah Zazi, an Afghan immigrant to the U.S., pleaded guilty to terrorism charges earlier this year. 

Advertisement

Ahmedzay's account of how the alleged U.S. plotters were personally counseled and instructed by top Qaeda terrorists is among the first evidence to surface in years that operatives believed to be close to Qaeda’s fugitive paramount leaders, Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, as of 2008 were still capable of organizing a plot intended to cause mass casualties against a major target inside the U.S. However, since that time, crackdowns by U.S. and Pakistani security forces against Qaeda operatives hiding out in Pakistan have taken a further toll on the group's leadership.

As we reported here, U.S. counterterrorism officials say they believe Rauf, who was linked by British investigators to a notoriously disruptive 2006 plot to simultaneously attack transatlantic airline flights using homemade bombs concealed in sports-drink bottles, was killed in an attack by a Predator drone-borne missile in North Waziristan around November 2008. For a time, Rauf had led something of a charmed existence as a terrorist, reportedly having been captured, and later having escaped, from the custody of Pakistani authorities. Family members claimed after the alleged drone attack that he was still alive, but U.S. officials expressed high confidence last year he was dead; one official, who asked for anonymity when discussing sensitive information, said on Friday that Rauf had not been heard from in many months—a fact that tends to support reports of his demise.

As we also reported here, the other senior Qaeda operative accused in Ahmedzay’s testimony of helping to organize the failed subway attack plot, al-Somali, was alleged by U.S. officials to have been killed last December in another drone-born missile strike at a target in the Pakistani tribal region.  At the time of his reported death, a U.S. counterterrorism official described al-Somali as an important cog in what is left of Al Qaeda's central leadership.

According to the official, the dead man "was responsible for Al Qaeda's operations outside the Afghan-Pakistan region. He was engaged in plotting throughout the world. Given his central role, this probably included plotting attacks against the United States and Europe. He took strategic guidance from Al Qaeda top leadership and translated it into operational blueprints for prospective terrorist attacks."

In its summary of evidence presented during Ahmedzay’s guilty-plea hearing, the Justice Department said that Ahmedzay, Zazi, and their third cohort were trained by  Qaeda leaders in using several different kinds of weapons, and discussed with the Qaeda chiefs possible targets and target dates for attacks in Manhattan. The Justice Department says that Qaeda leaders "emphasized the need to hit well-known structures and maximize the number of casualties." Zazi later received explosives training from Qaeda operatives, though Ahmedzay changed his mind and did not participate in this training, and apparently had reservations about the suicide-bombing plan, which he later rationalized away.

Back in the U.S., the government says, Zazi and Ahmedzay decided they would attack subway trains rather than buildings because of the limits on the amount of homemade explosives Zazi believed he could produce. The feds say Zazi drove cross-country from Denver to New York a few days before the 9/11 anniversary last September, taking with him homemade bomb ingredients. Law-enforcement officials now say that Zazi ditched the bomb-making materials after he was pulled over for questioning by police on the George Washington Bridge between New Jersey and New York, and concluded that the cops were on to him.


Not all terrorism: Obama tries to change subject


Apr 7, 2:04 AM (ET)

By MATT APUZZO

Google sponsored links
Volunteer in China - Find the Right China Volunteering Placement. 12,500+ Past Volunteers
GlobalVolunteerNetwork.org/C
 
Oxford Seminars - 60-hour TESOL/TEFL teacher training certification courses across the US
www.OxfordSeminars.com
 

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama's advisers plan to remove terms such as "Islamic radicalism" from a document outlining national security strategy and will use the new version to emphasize that the U.S. does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terrorism, counterterrorism officials say.

The change would be a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war. It currently states, "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century."

The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document is still being written and is unlikely to be released for weeks, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document is the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, as with his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.

The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the U.S. talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.

That shift away from terrorism has been building for a year, since Obama went to Cairo and promised a "new beginning" in the relationship between the U.S. and the Muslim world. The White House believes the previous administration based that relationship entirely on fighting terrorism and winning the war of ideas.

"You take a country where the overwhelming majority are not going to become terrorists, and you go in and say, 'We're building you a hospital so you don't become terrorists.' That doesn't make much sense," National Security Council staffer Pradeep Ramamurthy said.

Ramamurthy runs the administration's Global Engagement Directorate, a four-person National Security Council team that Obama launched last May with little fanfare and a vague mission to use diplomacy and outreach "in pursuit of a host of national security objectives." Since then, the division has not only helped change the vocabulary of fighting terrorism, but also has shaped the way the country invests in Muslim businesses, studies global warming, supports scientific research and combats polio.

Before diplomats go abroad, they hear from the Ramamurthy or his deputy, Jenny Urizar. When officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration returned from Indonesia, the NSC got a rundown about research opportunities on global warming. Ramamurthy maintains a database of interviews conducted by 50 U.S. embassies worldwide. And business leaders from more than 40 countries head to Washington this month for an "entrepreneurship summit" for Muslim businesses.

"Do you want to think about the U.S. as the nation that fights terrorism or the nation you want to do business with?" Ramamurthy said.

To deliver that message, Obama's speechwriters have taken inspiration from an unlikely source: former President Ronald Reagan. Visiting communist China in 1984, Reagan spoke at Fudan University in Shanghai about education, space exploration and scientific research. He discussed freedom and liberty. He never mentioned communism or democracy.

"They didn't look up to the U.S. because we hated communism," said Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, Obama's foreign policy speechwriter.

Like Reagan in China, Obama in Cairo made only passing references to terrorism. Instead he focused on cooperation. He announced the U.S. would team up to fight polio with the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, a multinational body based in Saudi Arabia. The U.S. and OIC had worked together before, but never with that focus.

"President Obama saw it as an opportunity to say, 'We work on things far beyond the war on terrorism,'" World Health Organization spokeswoman Sona Bari said.

Polio is endemic in three Muslim countries - Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan - but some Muslim leaders have been suspicious of vaccination efforts, which they believed to be part of a CIA sterilization campaign. Last year, the OIC and religious scholars at the International Islamic Fiqh Academy issued a fatwa, or religious decree, that parents should vaccinate their children.

"We're probably entering into a whole new level of engagement between the OIC and the polio program because of the stimulus coming from the U.S. government," said Michael Galway, who works on polio eradication for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also began working more closely with local Islamic leaders in northern Nigeria, a network that had been overlooked for years, said John Fitzsimmons, the deputy director of the CDC's immunization division.

Though health officials are reluctant to assign credit to any one action, new polio cases in Nigeria fell from 83 during the first quarter of last year to just one so far this year, Fitzsimmons said.

Public opinion polls also showed consistent improvement in U.S. sentiment within the Muslim world last year, though the viewpoints are still overwhelmingly negative.

Obama did not invent Muslim outreach. President George W. Bush gave the White House its first Quran, hosted its first Iftar dinner to celebrate Ramadan and loudly stated support for Muslim democracies like Turkey.

But the Bush administration struggled with its rhetoric. Muslims criticized Bush for describing the war on terrorism as a "crusade" and labeling the invasion of Afghanistan "Operation Infinite Justice" - words that were seen as religious. He regularly identified America's enemy as "Islamic extremists" and "radical jihadists."

Karen Hughes, a Bush confidante who served as his top diplomat to the Muslim world in his second term, urged the White House to stop.

"I did recommend that, in my judgment, it's unfortunate because of the way it's heard. We ought to avoid the language of religion," Hughes said. "Whenever they hear 'Islamic extremism, Islamic jihad, Islamic fundamentalism,' they perceive it as a sort of an attack on their faith. That's the world view Osama bin Laden wants them to have."

Hughes and Juan Zarate, Bush's former deputy national security adviser, said Obama's efforts build on groundwork from Bush's second term, when some of the rhetoric softened. But by then, Zarate said, it was overshadowed by the Guantanamo Bay detention center, the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison and a prolonged Iraq war.

"In some ways, it didn't matter what the president did or said. People weren't going to be listening to him in the way we wanted them to," Zarate said. "The difference is, President Obama had a fresh start."

Obama's foreign policy posture is not without political risk. Even as Obama steps up airstrikes on terrorists abroad, he has proven vulnerable to Republican criticism on security issues at home, such as the failed Christmas Day airline bombing and the announced-then-withdrawn plan to prosecute self-described 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York.

Peter Feaver, a Duke University political scientist and former Bush adviser, is skeptical of Obama's engagement effort. It "doesn't appear to have created much in the way of strategic benefit" in the Middle East peace process or in negotiations over Iran's nuclear ambitions, he said.

Obama runs the political risk of seeming to adopt politically correct rhetoric abroad while appearing tone-deaf on national security issues at home, Feaver said.

The White House dismisses such criticism. In June, Obama will travel to Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, and is expected to revisit many of the themes of his Cairo speech.

"This is the long-range direction we need to go in," Ramamurthy said.


Saudi arrests militants planning attacks
24 Mar 2010 16:48:08 GMT
Source: Reuters
 RIYADH, March 24 (Reuters) - Top oil exporter Saudi Arabia has arrested scores of militants accused of plotting attacks on oil facilities, in one of the biggest swoops by the kingdom in several years, state media said on Wednesday. [nLDE62N1S1]

Here are some comments on the arrests:

JUSTIN CRUMP, STIRLING ASSYNT BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE GROUP

"The militants were almost certainly planning to use combined firearms/explosives, probably in teams of about six each."

"The target is credible, as hitting the oil industry is a persistent, stated objective of AQAP (Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula). An uptick in hostile reconnaissance near oil sites was picked up nearly a year ago."

PAUL ROGERS, BRITISH DEFENCE AND SECURITY EXPERT

"The latest arrests are significant because they suggest multiple operations against several targets were planned."

"The Saudis have put an enormous effort into beefing up security at oil installations since the attack on the Abqaiq oil processing plant in 2006, which heightened concern about the protection of all the oil facilities including the possibility of sabotage. These installations are so huge that a successful attack could move the oil markets."

JULIAN DAVIES, SALAMANCA RISK MANAGEMENT

"I'm surprised neither by the attempted attacks nor by the fact that the attempts have failed.

"I think the tendency in al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) will be to go for the smaller scale, simpler, less resource-intensive operation where the likelihood of pulling something off is better.

"It's possible that they view the bigger operations as more attractive because they would get a bigger payoff. But you have to balance that against the real operational constraints that AQAP faces, including a very robust Saudi counter-terrorism regime and the requirement to operate over distance.

"For AQAP in Yemen, making links to militants in Saudi Arabia is more or less easy, but turning that into something operationally viable is much more difficult."

SAJJAN GOHEL, ASIA-PACIFIC FOUNDATION

"The problem in Saudi never goes away, it just goes into hibernation. Saudi Arabia is once again in the sights of terrorists, as Iraq comes under control, the number of foreign fighters there declines and al Qaeda's presence in Yemen expands. Hopefully this incident is a wake-up call to the region that this threat is still there."

HENRY WILKINSON, JANUSIAN SECURITY CONSULTANTS

"These arrests demonstrate that, despite a relative lack of successful attacks in recent years, terrorists maintain a consistently high level of intent to stage attacks inside the kingdom.

"These arrests are almost certainly tied to Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and show that the group is still projecting a terrorist threat outside of Yemen. Most of the indications are that AQAP remains largely undiminished by counter-terrorist activity in Yemen and represents a consistent if not growing threat to the oil sector and Western interests in the region.

"The circumstances surrounding these arrests are unclear. The Saudi authorities have a history of announcing large numbers of arrests that have in fact been accrued over an extended period of time. However, they seem to show that the Saudi oil sector remains a priority target for al Qaeda.

"The arrests also show that, despite the high level of threat, the Saudi security services are effective at making the kingdom a challenging environment for terrorists to operate in." (Reporting by William Maclean; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Canada reassigns warship to fight al Qaeda attacks
24 Mar 2010 17:08:41 GMT
Source: Reuters
 OTTAWA, March 24 (Reuters) - Canada has canceled a visit to India for one of its warships and assigned it to counterterrorism operations in the Gulf of Aden because of risks of al Qaeda attacks, an officer on the ship said on Wednesday.

Canadian authorities working with their allies in the area determined that an increased threat from al Qaeda warranted the frigate HMCS Fredericton shifting to counterterrorism duties from originally planned joint exercises with India.

"This was more important, based on the immediate threat," Navy Lieutenant Brian Owens from the Fredericton in the Gulf of Aden area, which is near the mouth of the Red Sea.

The Fredericton had already been in the area combating piracy, where cargo ships are being held for ransom, and has now shifted its attention to fighting attacks on ships aimed simply at destroying them.

Two weeks ago, the U.S. government warned ships sailing off Yemen's coast of the risk of al Qaeda attacks similar to a suicide bombing of the U.S. warship Cole in 2000, which killed 17 sailors. (Reporting by Randall Palmer; editing by Rob Wilson)

From The Sunday Times
March 21, 2010

Iranians train Taliban to use roadside bombs

Taliban with motorbikes & AK47s in Wardak badlands.

Taliban with motorbikes & AK47s in Wardak badlands.

Miles Amoore in Kabul

 

TALIBAN commanders have revealed that hundreds of insurgents have been trained in Iran to kill Nato forces in Afghanistan.

The commanders said they had learnt to mount complex ambushes and lay improvised explosive devices (IEDs), which have been responsible for most of the deaths of British troops in Helmand province.

The accounts of two commanders, in interviews with The Sunday Times, are the first descriptions of training of the Taliban in Iran.

According to the commanders, Iranian officials paid them to attend three-month courses during the winter.

They were smuggled across the border to the city of Zahidan, in southeast Iran, an hour’s drive from training camps in the desert.

Instructors in plain clothes provided daily exercises in live firing. The first month was devoted largely to teaching the Taliban how to attack convoys and how to escape before Nato forces could respond.

During their second month they were shown how to plant IEDs in sequence so that the rescuers of soldiers wounded in one blast would be caught in further explosions.

The third month was spent on storming bases and checkpoints. A hilltop fort was among the locations used for practice by a Taliban platoon.

Local mediators persuaded the commanders to travel to Kabul to tell their stories. They were interviewed on separate occasions on the edge of the city.

Western officials troubled by growing Iranian support for the Taliban describe the accounts as credible. A military crackdown in Pakistan is thought to have encouraged Taliban leaders to look to Iran for more help.

One of the commanders said: “The military is pressuring the Taliban in Pakistan. It is certainly harder to reach places that were once easy to get into. I think more of my fighters will travel to Iran for training this year.”

Karl Eikenberry, the American ambassador to Afghanistan, recently described signs of co-operation between Iran and the Taliban as disturbing.

“Iran or elements within Iran have provided training assistance and some weapons to the Taliban,” he said.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran has publicly backed his Afghan counterpart, Hamid Karzai. But American and British officials have accused Iran of playing a double game by giving covert backing to the Taliban.

Shi’ite Iran had long opposed the Sunni-dominated Taliban. The reason for the change was summarised by one Taliban commander who said of the Iranians: “Our religions and our histories are different but our target is the same. We both want to kill Americans.”


Israel Official Says Hamas Rockets Can Reach Tel Aviv
 

By Gwen Ackerman and Calev Ben-David

Nov. 3 (Bloomberg) -- The Islamic Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip can now launch rockets capable of reaching the Israeli metropolitan area of Tel Aviv, Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said at a Jerusalem briefing.

“We know they have tried to, and have obtained missiles that reach 60 kilometers (37 miles),” Ayalon said today. “Tel Aviv and its vicinity are now under the range of Hamas.”

During Israel’s military operation against Hamas in Gaza, which ended in January, the farthest rocket strike was some 40 kilometers into Israel, endangering southern cities such as Ashdod and Beersheba.

Since the three-week operation, Hamas has been able to replenish its stock of military equipment and explosives as well as upgrade its rocket capability, Ayalon said. Hamas is receiving support from Iran, which is using the Islamic movement to increase its influence in the region, he said.

Hamas recently successfully tested a rocket with a 60- kilometer range, Major General Amos Yadlin, chief of military intelligence, told a parliamentary committee in Jerusalem today, according to the YNet news Web site.

When reached for comment, Abu Obaida, spokesman for Hamas’s military wing, said: “We are not interested in responding to the Zionist intelligence reports. They can say whatever they want.”

In 2008, some 3,300 rockets and mortars were fired into Israel, according to the Israeli army. During the 22-day Gaza operation the number was 800, and since it concluded on Jan. 18 there have been 250 more, the army said.

The Hamas Ministry of Health in Gaza said that 1,450 Palestinians were killed during the military operation, while Israel puts the number at 1,166. The army said 13 Israelis died in the violence, and a total of 24 have been killed in rocket and mortar attacks since they started in 2001.

Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by Israel, the U.S. and the European Union.

To contact the reporter on this story: Gwen Ackerman in Jerusalem at gackerman@bloomberg.net.

Last Updated: November 3, 2009 08:33 EST
  • The Wall Street Journal
  • ASIA NEWS
  • OCTOBER 6, 2009

Al Qaeda's Diminished Role Stirs Afghan Troop Debate

By MATTHEW ROSENBERG in Islamabad and SIOBHAN GORMAN in Washington

Since first invading Afghanistan nearly a decade ago, America set one primary goal: Eliminate al Qaeda's safe haven.

Today, intelligence and military officials say they've severely constrained al Qaeda's ability to operate there and in Pakistan -- and that's reshaping the debate over U.S. strategy in the region.

Hunted by U.S. drones, beset by money problems and finding it tougher to lure young Arabs to the bleak mountains of Pakistan, al Qaeda is seeing its role shrink there and in Afghanistan, according to intelligence reports and Pakistani and U.S. officials. Conversations intercepted by the U.S. show al Qaeda fighters complaining of shortages of weapons, clothing and, in some cases, food. The number of foreign fighters in Afghanistan appears to be declining, U.S. military officials say.

[An Afghan army commander, left, with a U.S. Marine in Helmand province ] Associated Press

An Afghan army commander, left, with a U.S. Marine in Helmand province Sunday.

For Arab youths who are al Qaeda's primary recruits, "it's not romantic to be cold and hungry and hiding," said a senior U.S. official in South Asia.

In Washington, the question of Al Qaeda's strength is at the heart of the debate over whether to send thousands more troops to Afghanistan. On Saturday, eight American troops and two Afghan soldiers were killed fighting Taliban forces -- one of the worst single-day battlefield losses for U.S. forces since the war began.

Opponents of sending more troops prefer a narrower campaign consisting of missile strikes and covert action inside Pakistan, rather than a broader war against the Taliban, the radical Islamist movement that ruled Afghanistan for years and provided a haven to al Qaeda's Osama bin Laden. Their reasoning: The larger threat to America remains al Qaeda, not the Taliban; so, best not to get embroiled in a local war that history suggests may be unwinnable.

Regional Violence

Military commanders pressing for extra troops counter that sending more forces could help translate the gains against al Qaeda into a political settlement with less ideologically committed elements of the Taliban. And, they argue, that would improve the odds of stabilizing Afghanistan for the long run.

A key point of contention in President Barack Obama's review of war strategy is the ability of al Qaeda to reconstitute in Afghanistan. Some officials, including aides to Richard Holbrooke, the U.S.'s special representative to the region, have argued that the Taliban wouldn't allow al Qaeda to regain its footing inside Afghanistan, since it was the alliance between the two that cost the Taliban their control of the country after Sept. 11.

A senior military official, however, characterized this as a minority view within the debate. He noted that even if the Taliban sought to keep al Qaeda from returning, it would have little means to do so.

Retired Gen. James Jones, the president's National Security Adviser, acknowledged on CNN Sunday that the links between the two groups had become a "central issue" in the White House discussion. He said he believed the return of the Taliban "could" mean the return of al Qaeda.

In the political debate, al Qaeda's diminished role has bolstered the argument of those advocating a narrower campaign. They say continuing the drone campaign is sufficient to keep al Qaeda at bay, said Bruce Hoffman, a Georgetown University professor who has written extensively on al Qaeda. Mr. Hoffman believes that argument is misguided, however, and that if the U.S. pulls out, al Qaeda will return.

"Al Qaeda may be diminished, but it still poses a threat," he said. The debate will move to Capitol Hill Tuesday when the Senate Foreign Relations Committee holds a hearing on confronting al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

Though there is emerging international consensus among counterterrorism officials that al Qaeda isn't the foe it used to be, U.S., Afghan and Pakistani officials caution that it doesn't mean the fight in Afghanistan or Pakistan is tilting America's way. "They're not defeated. They're not dismantled, but they are being disrupted," said a senior U.S. intelligence official in Washington.

Mr. Obama himself has argued that al Qaeda could strengthen if the U.S. eases up on the Taliban. "If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting," he said at a speech in Phoenix at the Veterans of Foreign Wars convention in August, before the current strategy debate heated up. "This is fundamental to the defense of our people."

Al Qaeda apparently retains a global reach, as suggested by the Sept. 19 arrest in Colorado of Najibullah Zazi, 24 years old. U.S. prosecutors allege Mr. Zazi is part of an al Qaeda cell who trained in Pakistan and was trying to make the same kind of explosives used in the 2005 London bombings.

U.S. officials also say al Qaeda remains tight with the network of Jalaluddin Haqqani and his son, Sirajuddin, one of the Afghan insurgency's top leaders. The late leader of the Pakistan Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud, was similarly close with al Qaeda before being killed in August by a strike from a U.S. drone aircraft. U.S. officials say they hope his death will weaken al Qaeda's Taliban ties.

[Al Qaeda's Diminished Role Stirs Debate ]

For years, the fortunes of al Qaeda and the Taliban moved in tandem. The Taliban hosted al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and Mr. bin Laden's network launched its 2001 attacks from there. After the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan, the Taliban continued to provide haven after retreating to the tribal areas of Pakistan, while al Qaeda trained Taliban fighters.

But in the past year, the fates of the two organizations have diverged. The Taliban insurgency has become increasingly violent and brazen and spread to areas of Afghanistan that only a year ago were considered solidly pro-government. Al Qaeda, in contrast, has seen its role shrink because it is struggling to raise money from its global network of financiers and attract recruits.

Today there are signs al Qaeda is relying more on affiliated groups to press its agenda world-wide, according to one official briefed on the matter. These groups include Pakistani movements such as Jaish-e-Muhammad and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, Indonesia-based Jemaah Islamiyah and the Islamic Jihad Union, whose roots are in Uzbekistan.

As affiliates like these "continue to develop and evolve," their threat to the U.S. has grown, Michael Leiter, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, said in Senate hearings last week.

Meanwhile in Afghanistan, the presence of fewer foreign fighters -- Arabs, Chechens, Uzbeks and others -- potentially changes the dynamics of the fight there.

Foreign militants serve as a battlefield "accellerant," said Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the commander of U.S. and North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces in Afghanistan, in an interview. "When a foreign fighter comes into Afghanistan, he doesn't have anything else he's going to do -- he's going to fight until he dies or goes somewhere else," he said. By contrast, "an Afghan is fighting for something, and if he starts to get that, his motivation changes."

Right now, Gen. McChrystal said, "we don't see huge numbers of foreign fighters, which obviously makes you believe there's not nearly the presence there was of foreign fighters....I hope it's a trend, but I'm not prepared to confidently say that."

Even if Al Qaeda is struggling, it already has imparted dangerous knowledge -- how to build suicide car bombs, launch complex gunmen assaults and tap wealthy sympathizers in the Persian Gulf -- that made it a key asset to the Taliban several years ago.

Al Qaeda also remains allied with and protected by the Taliban. Allowing the insurgents to succeed would likely give al Qaeda the space it needs to regroup, rearm and, most importantly, reestablish itself as the premier global jihadi movement, U.S., Pakistani and Afghan officials say.

Al Qaeda's message of world-wide jihad, however, has lost much of its popularity amid the rise of militant groups in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere who tend to focus their ire locally. That, combined with a perception among would-be followers that the group has only paid lip-service to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, also has reduced its global credibility, officials say.

Support is even declining among some of al Qaeda's allies. It has lost support from a group of Saudi sheiks known as the Sahwa, or "Awakening," movement. (It's unrelated to a similar-sounding group in Iraq.) Some of the sheiks are now trying to persuade members of al Qaeda's North African branch to give up jihad, said Daniel Lav, director of the Middle East and North Africa Reform Project at the Middle East Media Research Institute in Washington.

Mr. bin Laden and al Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri are believed to be hiding in Pakistan's tribal lands bordering Afghanistan. But a U.S. campaign of missile strikes by pilotless Predator aircraft has decimated al Qaeda's second- and third-tier leadership.

One example cited by U.S. and Pakistani officials: Usama al-Kini, a Kenyan citizen believed to have been al Qaeda's operations chief inside Pakistan and a key architect of the September 2008 truck bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, which killed at least 50 people. He was slain along with his deputy, Sheik Ahmed Salim Swedan, a Kenyan, in a Jan. 1 missile strike, officials say.

Both men's history with al Qaeda stretched back to the group's first major strike, the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Officials also pointed to Rashid Rauf, the alleged mastermind of a 2006 plot to blow up airliners over the Atlantic, who they say was slain in a drone attack last year, although Pakistani and British officials express uncertainty over whether he is actually dead.

But even if Mr. Rauf is still alive, the fact that he became such a primary target made it tough for him to fulfill his role as a communications link between Pakistan and Britain, says an officer from Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence spy agency. Other operatives who have been detained by British authorizes have further eroded those communications links, an official familiar with the intelligence reports on al Qaeda added.

The drones, operated by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, have so far killed 11 of the men on the U.S.'s initial list of the top 20 al Qaeda targets, the official said. The U.S. has since drawn up a fresh list, including the nine holdovers from the first one. Four of the men on the new list are now dead, too. Those who remain are focused on finding sanctuary, possibly at the expense of operations and training, say officials and militants with links to al Qaeda.

"The Arabs stay out of sight now. They were always secretive. But now they are very secretive...They see spies everywhere," said a man named Walliullah, who Pakistani officials say is an aide to Afghan insurgent leader Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. Mr. Hekmatyar is allied with the Afghan Taliban and loosely tied to al Qaeda.

At the same time, U.S. intelligence collection in Pakistan has vastly improved, officials say. Western intelligence services have had more success penetrating al Qaeda groups lately, according to Richard Barrett, the United Nations' coordinator for monitoring al Qaeda and the Taliban. "There's many more human sources being run into the groups," Mr. Barrett, a former official with Britain's Secret Intelligence Service, told an audience at a Washington think tank last week.

Similarly, the U.S. in the past was unable to comprehensively monitor communications in Pakistan; that has now been rectified, said an official briefed on U.S. operations. Through that monitoring, U.S., British and Pakistani intelligence officials have seen increasing evidence that al Qaeda is having difficulty raising money.

"Al Qaeda is in fund-raising mode, and they seem to be hurting for cash," said another U.S. official. Intercepts of conversations have caught al Qaeda militants complaining they lack cash and supplies, including weapons.

The new intelligence has provided fresh ways to try to undermine the foreign al Qaeda fighters. Pakistani authorities say they've started targeting food shipments believed to be headed for al Qaeda operatives, who prefer their own cuisine over local fare. "The Talibs, they're eating mutton, chicken, bread -- the food ordinary people eat," said an officer from Pakistan's ISI spy agency. "The Arabs want their own food."

—Rehmat Mehsud in Islamabad and Evan Perez and Peter Spiegel in Washington contributed to this report.

Write to Matthew Rosenberg at matthew.rosenberg@wsj.com and Siobhan Gorman at siobhan.gorman@wsj.com


SPIEGEL ONLINE

SPIEGEL ONLINE

09/28/2009 05:02 PM

Al-Qaida Warnings

Threat of Terror Escalates in Germany

By Yassin Musharbash, Marcel Rosenbach and Holger Stark

In the run-up to Germany's national election, al-Qaida released a series of propaganda videos directly targeted at a German audience. German intelligence agencies are taking the threats seriously -- even if they have so far not uncovered any evidence of concrete attack plans.

In early June, the image of a slim man wearing a dark suit, a white shirt and a shiny light-blue tie, standing in front of a dark-red velvet curtain, was broadcast around the world. It was the new US president, Barack Obama, giving a remarkable speech to the Muslim world at the University of Cairo, in which he called for an end to the cycle of suspicion and discord between the United States and the Muslim world. He said that he had come to Egypt to seek a new beginning.

A similar image appeared three months later, in a video which has been circulating on the Internet since Sept. 18. Again, a slim man, wearing a dark suit, white shirt and shiny light-blue tie is standing in front of a dark-red velvet curtain. But unlike Obama, this man has shoulder-length, greasy hair and looks like an overgrown version of a gawky teenager. The man, Bekkay Harrach, 32, is a militant Islamist, and he wants to instill fear in the German population.

Speaking in a markedly soft voice, the German-Moroccan swears an oath of allegiance to terrorist leader Osama bin Laden. He threatened "bitter consequences" and a "grim awakening" in the 14 days following the German national election, if its result did not lead to the withdrawal of German troops from Afghanistan.

Trying to Influence the Election

The video resembles a badly made comedy sketch, and yet it has caused unease among German security authorities. It doesn't take a professional terrorism expert to feel threatened by the appearance of a known al-Qaida member a few days before an important election. The terrorist network has already attempted to influence elections in the West on two occasions. On March 11, 2004, 10 bombs exploded in several commuter trains in Madrid, killing 191 people. Three days later, the conservatives, who had previously been tipped to win, lost Spain's parliamentary election. The Socialist candidate and new prime minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, promptly initiated the withdrawal of Spanish troops his predecessor had sent to Iraq to support the US campaign there. And even though Zapatero also increased the Spanish contingent in Afghanistan, the bombing was a triumph from al-Qaida's point of view.

In October of the same year, terrorist leader bin Laden sought to influence the US presidential election. Some believe that the race between incumbent President George W. Bush and his Democratic challenger John Kerry would have ended differently if bin Laden had not released a new video just a few days before the election.

And now Germany. Does the Harrach video represent al-Qaida's third attempt to shape politic opinion in a major Western country? And how should the young terrorist's message be interpreted? Is it "merely" intended to instill fear in the German public? Or is he announcing an attack?

State of Anxiety

Harrach's hateful video had hardly been released before German Chancellor Angela Merkel took steps to show just how calm she was. "German security authorities are doing everything in their power to guarantee the safety of the population," Merkel reassured the German public.

Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble also seemed unruffled. "We will not allow ourselves to fall into a state of anxiety, which is what the terrorists hope to achieve with attacks," Schäuble said, and added, in remarks clearly directed at Harrach and al-Qaida: "Whatever you do, you will not influence the democratic process in Germany."

Germany has seen various terrorist threats in recent years, including the failed plots of the so-called "suitcase" bombers who left bombs on regional trains in 2006 and the Sauerland cell whose planned attacks against US targets in Germany were foiled by investigators in 2007. Germans were also among the casualties in the 2002 bombing on the Tunisian resort island of Djerba. The fact that the chancellor and the interior minister reacted to Harrach's tirades shows that they are taking him seriously. Indeed, the video has changed the security situation in Germany.

In the past, authorities had consistently said that Germany is part of a "worldwide danger zone" and that an "abstract threat" existed. The Harrach video has made it more concrete, attaching a face to the threat, the soft, youthful face of a man intelligence officials say has reached the middle level of the al-Qaida leadership. Harrach is believed to be a member of the terror network's external operations committee, which is apparently responsible for attacks abroad.

On German Soil

The question is no longer whether Bin Laden's terrorist organization has set its sights on Germany. Germany is only the second Western country, next to the United States, that al-Qaida has addressed so directly and in its native language. "What is new about this is that the terrorists have expressly stated their intention to act on German soil, and have specified a timeframe for attacks," says August Hanning, a senior official in the Interior Ministry, who does not believe that Harrach is acting alone. "We think that this was authorized by the al-Qaida leadership."

This is precisely what the terrorist group signaled in a subsequent propaganda video, which includes a reference to Harrach's threats. Then an Osama bin Laden audio message, which was posted on the Internet Friday and featured German subtitles, demanded that Europeans leave Afghanistan. Yet another Internet video, apparently from the Taliban, appeared later on Friday threatening Germany. That video showed images of famous sights in Germany, including Berlin's Brandenburg Gate, Cologne Cathedral and the Oktoberfest festival in Munich.

Until now, German authorities had assumed that possible attacks would be aimed at Germans and German interests abroad, such as attacks on the German military, the Bundeswehr, in Afghanistan or spectacular kidnapping cases. But this assessment has now changed. "Harrach's statements underscore the existing threat of attacks in Germany and against German interests worldwide," writes the German Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) in a report dated last Tuesday.

High Threat Level

Investigators are concerned about the clear strategy behind the series of messages and the gradual escalation of their content. For the first time, the messages include direct threats and a clearly defined timetable. Intelligence agents also regard the string of messages as an al-Qaida campaign designed well in advance to coincide with the Bundestag election. The volume of propaganda in related online forums has also increased. Jihadist terror groups have already issued at least 17 propaganda messages specifically relating to Germany in 2009, compared with only six such messages in 2008.

According to the US company IntelCenter, which specializes in analyzing such forums, the use of German as a propaganda language has experienced an "unprecedented increase" in jihadist publications. The US experts believe that the threat of attack in Germany is now "at a significantly high level."

This is consistent with the conclusions of various intelligence agencies. In late May, the US government warned German security authorities that the al-Qaida leadership had apparently "singled out" Germany for attacks. US authorities believe al-Qaida's branch in North Africa is slated to carry out possible attacks, and that one of its leaders, Abu Zaid, is pressing ahead with plans to target Germany.

Last weekend, US Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Jane Holl Lute contacted her German counterpart, August Hanning, to reiterate the warning that Germany is under threat.

'Maintain a Low Profile'

Washington is clearly taking the situation seriously. Citing the Harrach video, the US State Department issued a travel alert for US citizens in Germany, advising them "to maintain good security practices at all times, and to maintain a heightened situational awareness and a low profile." The alert is valid until Nov. 11.

In July, when the Americans issued their first warnings, BKA President Jörg Ziercke convened a meeting of senior government officials in Berlin to discuss the aggravated security situation. The group approved a package of security measures, key parts of which were activated in a teleconference last Thursday.

Since then, federal police officers carrying machine guns have been patrolling airports, the intelligence agencies have intensified reconnaissance and cooperation, known Islamic activists are being scrutinized and helicopters are circling over major train stations. But none of these efforts has produced any results yet. "We still have no information about concrete attack plans," says Hanning.

German security authorities have beefed up their infrastructure and resources in the last eight years since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. They are determined not to suffer a repeat of the humiliating case of the 9/11 terrorists, who were able to prepare for their attacks in a student apartment in Hamburg without attracting the authorities' attention. Security laws have been gradually tightened, laws were enacted to require communication companies to store data on telephone calls and emails, and a steadily growing number of telephone calls were monitored. In addition, counterterrorism databases were set up and intelligence agencies have recruited more experts on Islamist terrorism.

Looking for Recruits

Nevertheless, this massive effort failed to prevent a man like Aleem Nasir, who authorities identified as a sympathizer with terrorist organizations as long ago as 2001, from traveling unimpeded from his home in the western German town of Germersheim to Pakistan and the border region with Afghanistan, where he delivered money and equipment to al-Qaida fighters. Nasir is believed to have been in contact with senior al-Qaida leaders since 2004 at the latest, and to have actively participated in fighting against US troops in 2006.

It was not until June 2007 that Nasir was arrested, in Lahore, Pakistan. His trial offered deep insights into current al-Qaida structures in Germany. Since then, it has been clear that the organization remains active in Germany, where it continues to recruit new blood.

This July, a higher regional court in the western city of Koblenz sentenced Nasir to eight years' imprisonment, partly for membership of a terrorist organization. The judges were convinced that Nasir, who had claimed to be a dealer in precious stones, was in fact responsible for providing al-Qaida with equipment, which he obtained from companies like Frankonia, a Stuttgart-based supplier of hunting equipment.

Investigators also believe that one of Nasir's responsibilities in Germany was to "search for people willing to undergo military training in an al-Qaida camp," who would then be "available for the organization's terrorist activities." Nasir was an important point of contact in the German terrorist recruitment network. Nasir apparently met Bekkay Harrach in the southern town of Sindelfingen around the end of 2006, through a suspected associate who investigators say kept an eye out for promising recruits for Nasir.

'Something Planned for Germany'

When Harrach traveled to a training camp in the Pakistani-Afghan border area via Iran a short time later, he brought along a letter of recommendation from Nasir. In June 2007, the two men are believed to have met again in a camp in the Pakistani border province of Waziristan, where Harrach was apparently being trained in the use of weapons and explosives.

After a failed attempt to return to Germany, Nasir was arrested in Pakistan, where he confessed to authorities. There is a serious problem with his confession, however, in that it was apparently obtained through torture. He later told German officials that he had made up parts of the confession.

According to a June 27, 2007 report by the Pakistani intelligence agency ISI, Nasir had "speculated" that "something was planned for Germany." From today's perspective, the passages in the controversial ISI report relating to other possible al-Qaida aspirants in Germany seem particularly significant. The report states that Harrach asked Nasir to bring "a few of his colleagues" to Waziristan. Another German recruit in Nasir's care is believed to have asked to have four other individuals, who are not identified by name, smuggled out of the Bonn area.

Ties to Germany

To this day, German intelligence officials are not certain whether a plan to stage attacks in Germany was discussed in the training camp in Waziristan, although they have not ruled out the possibility. Even knowing how many al-Qaida members they are dealing with would be helpful to the German officials. "We are trying to illuminate an enormous, dark field with small flashlights," says a member of Germany's domestic intelligence service, the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. "We have many people in our sights, but no one knows whether we have identified all the relevant individuals."

BKA President Jörg Ziercke is also unable to give a conclusive answer to the question of where the men who returned from the Pakistani training camps are in Germany today. His agency, which is currently conducting more than 200 terrorism-related investigations, has only a rudimentary grasp of the scope of the problem. German authorities don't even know the real names of some of these men, while others have only been identified in CIA reports.

According to an internal BKA situation report, the agency has information about "approximately 180 individuals with ties to Germany, who are believed to have received or intend to receive paramilitary training." About 80 have apparently returned to Germany, of which 15 are in custody.

Because of this lack of certainty, specialists at the intelligence agencies' Joint Internet Center (GIZ) in Berlin are feverishly analyzing the latest al-Qaida videos. Do they contain hidden clues about targets and possible attackers? And could they even contain orders for an al-Qaida team?

A Successful Campaign

Experts believe that Harrach, with his attempt to come across as a leader in the video, was mainly interested in establishing himself as an al-Qaida representative to be taken seriously. But why the warning in the first place? Why not stage an attack without providing advance notice? Apparently, the German jihadist is emulating his idol bin Laden, who has consistently claimed to have given due warning before attacks. After Sept. 11, 2001, bin Laden, citing interviews he had given to Western journalists, insisted that he had pointed out the risk of attack to the United States "again and again."

In his video, Harrach embraces another of the al-Qaida leader's arguments. In a democracy, he says, the electorate can be held responsible for its government's decisions, because the people, after all, have voted their government into office. Does this imply that a threat must inevitably lead to an attack? Apparently not. Bin Laden himself in 2006 announced further "imminent" attacks on the United States, attacks that never took place.

Would the absence of an attack in Germany constitute a loss of face for al-Qaida, as many experts believe? Not necessarily. Even after the expiration of Harrach's two-week warning period, no security agency would believe that the threat level had somehow decreased. The German Interior Ministry is already recommending that the additional security measures which were introduced following the Harrach video be continued for a longer period than just a few days after the election, as was originally planned.

From the terrorists' perspective, their campaign linked to Germany's 2009 national election is already a success. Suddenly everything seems possible.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan


THE CONTENT OF THIS WEBSITE DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE OPINION OF THE OWNER ... At least that's what my lawyer told me, but he was drinking pretty heavily at the time so...


COPYRIGHT HARDIN REPUBLIC, LLC 2009.  All Rights Reserved.

Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®

We Are the NEW Media